Jan Hernych vs Nathan Healey Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W L L
Form
L W L L W W W L L LHead-2-Head: Hernych 1 - 0 Healey
They have played 1 sets in total, with Hernych winning 1 and Healey winning 0. The last match between Hernych and Healey was at the Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington, 30-07-2007, First, Hard with Jan Hernych getting the victory 6-3 1-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jan Hernych | 1 |
| Nathan Healey | 0 |
Legg Mason Tennis Classic - Washington(30-07-2007)
6
3
1
1
| Hernych | Stats | Healey |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 59 | Highest Rank | 159 |
| 45 | Age | 45 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 3 |
| 57% (501-384) | Career Total W/L | 53% (183-163) |
| $879,310 | Career Prize Money | $111,195 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lehecka VS Norrie PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-1 ret. |
Stats 
Jan Hernych
Player
Nathan Healey
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 7 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 63% (19/30) | 1st Serve % | 50% (19/38) |
| 84% (16/19) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (13/19) |
| 73% (8/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 17% (1/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (16/38) | Return Points Win % | 20% (6/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jan Hernych Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Souza
Player
Jan Hernych
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ondrej Krstev
Player
Jan Hernych
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hernych
Player
Thomas Statzberger
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Jan Hernych
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
16
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Hernych
Player
Filip Veger
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hernych
Player
Tadeas Paroulek
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Jan Hernych
58%
(
58 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Hernych
Player
Matej Vocel
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
47%
(
8 of
17)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
15
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hernych
Player
Pavel Motl
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Nathan Healey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (501/384) | Win/Loss | 53% (183/163) |
| 55% (1177/947) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (435/381) |
| 52% (10620/9776) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4091/3827) |
| 57% (171/129) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (115/98) |
| 51% (123/117) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (22/28) |
| 59% (149/104) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (10/15) |
| 63% (58/34) | Grass Win/Loss | 62% (36/22) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1579 | Aces Total | 208 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1018 | Total Double Faults | 196 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 557.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 492.64 |
| 63% (19482/30784) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1370/2374) |
| 68% (13324/19465) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (988/1370) |
| 51% (5816/11297) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (479/996) |
| 40% (1174/2899) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (70/204) |
| 39% (11971/30898) | Return Points Win % | 35% (804/2296) |
| 51% (49/48) | Slam W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 57% (39/29) | Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (141/128) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (30/37) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (228/162) | Challenger W/L | 52% (102/94) |
| 76% (44/14) | Futures W/L | 70% (39/17) |
| 58% (482/838) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (176/327) |
| 37% (13/35) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 52% (158/305) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (63/143) |
| 49% (154/313) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (51/117) |
| 83% (504/418) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (192/157) |
| 17% (504/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (192/35) |
| 22% (380/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (154/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
